>> It's not a bug. Both are perfectly valid, and completely equivalent, >> headers. >> >Nice to read this! >Just for interrest, could you explaine why courier rewrites the header ? > >The reason I ask this are that one Provider will not accept such a >header an don't pass on the mail to the recipient. > >Could you please point me to the relevant RFC to show him that's an >valid header. >
http://docs.perimeter.co.za/RFC/rfc822.txt (My Copy - you may validate it anywhere you choose :) Look for section "B.1. SYNTAX" . It explains that field body may consist of any text separated by white space and CRLF in any arbitrary combination (well, almost any). --- Regards, Patrick O'Reilly. ___ _ __ / _ )__ __ (_)_ __ ___ _/ /____ __ / __/ -_) _) / ~ ) -_), ,-/ -_) _) /_/ \__/_//_/_/~/_/\__/ \__/\__/_/ http://www.perimeter.co.za ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
