On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 14:16:53 -0400 Sam Varshavchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josh Trutwin writes: > > > The other option would be to up the smtp-poplock timeout value to > > something like 12 hours, but I don't care for that solution if there is a > > better one. > > The better solution is to use authenticated ESMTP, which is supported by > every modern mail client and server. POP3 after SMTP, or IMAP after SMTP, > is an ugly hack that nobody should waste time with, any more. Thanks, I'll look into this, I certainly can now agree about the ugliness involved with POP/IMAP after SMTP. In theory it sounds easy, in practice though... Josh ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0 _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
