Jon Nelson wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Dan Melomedman wrote: > > > Dan Melomedman wrote: > > > Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > > > Dan Melomedman writes: > > > > > > > > >Mr. Sam, which 'logger' directive did you mention the last time? I want > > > > >courierd's logs sent to a program, not syslog. Is this functionality > > > > >supported? Thanks. > > > > > > > > Nope, not in courierd's case. Logs from other daemons could be easily > > > > redirected, but not courierd's. > > > > > > Wouldn't this be a useful feature to have? Syslog is ridiculously slow > > > among other things. > > > > Also, the design could be much more flexible if courierd ran in > > the foreground, and simply wrote logs to stderr or stdout. Then a > > sysadmin could use supervisors and loggers of his/her choice instead of > > relying on the broken syslog, and the unriliable PID/lock files > > mechanisms. > > In general, I agree. I use freedt (a *free* replacement for > daemontools), and very much subscribe to that method of process
I like both daemontools and runit. I like runit because it's easy to replace SysV/BSD init (this should have gone away years ago in favor of something like runit) with it than with daemontools. ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
