On 12. Mrz 2004, at 20:29, Julian Mehnle wrote:
Lorenzo Perone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Yet SPF _could_ be a way of "forcing" authentication for local users - assuming that authenticated sessions can override the SPF filters.
They can. Where do you see a problem?
Then again, I should use separate hosts for authenticated smtp sessions
and for MX...
"could"? Yes. "should"? No, why?
However it is not a viable solution (like I was thinking at first), to tag mails as "untrusted" ones when they are unauthenticated (or w/invalid spf) and have local (hosted) domains "From: " headers: This is what mailing lists usually do.
Why is it not a viable solution?
A new mail transfer protocol is overdue, i guess... :(
What would be changed by a new protocol?
I think some of Your questions are answered along the thread, but I think I'll sort out a few things, tryout your (at first sight) excellent Courier-Filter, and get back to the questions - hopefully with some solutions, too.
Thanx a lot, Regards,
Lorenzo
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
