Andre Nicholson wrote:
Or is there another backup method I should be using?

Linux->Linux

Nothing wrong with backing up files to a Windows machine

Except that when moving data from a more capable machine to a less capable machine, the less capable machine may lose data. For instance, moving data from an old Mac to a FAT filesystem would lose the resource fork and other information that was essential to the Mac, but had no analogue on Win32. Similarly, Unix filesystems forbid only the '/' character in filenames, and allow any other byte value including UTF-8 extended bytes. Windows filesystems are less capable, so it may not be possible to use them as a backup for a more capable system.

Out of curiosity, why would you copy the files as they are one by one
instead of a large, compressed chunk?

Presumably, John expects the changes between backup intervals to be less than the compressed size of the full system.


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users

Reply via email to