Ricardo Kleemann wrote:
> Here's what I have in the bofh file (created via courierwebadmin):
>  
> opt BOFHSPFHELO=pass,none,neutral,softfail,unknown
> opt BOFHSPFMAILFROM=pass,none,neutral,softfail,unknown
> opt BOFHSPFFROM=pass,none,neutral,softfail,unknown

Fine, "none" is accepted for each field.

> I received a message and it shows the following headers:
>  
> Received-SPF: none (Address does not pass the Sender Policy Framework)
>  SPF=HELO; sender=HOTINVESTMENT2U.INFO;
>  remoteip=::ffff:204.86.119.100;
>  remotehost=100-119-86-204.virtualvhosting.com;
>  helo=HOTINVESTMENT2U.INFO; receiver=email1.americasnet.com;
> Received-SPF: none (Address does not pass the Sender Policy Framework)
>  SPF=MAILFROM; sender=instantfacel...@hotinvestment2u.info 
> <mailto:sender=instantfacel...@hotinvestment2u.info>;
>  remoteip=::ffff:204.86.119.100;
>  remotehost=100-119-86-204.virtualvhosting.com;
>  helo=HOTINVESTMENT2U.INFO; receiver=email1.americasnet.com;
>  
> Shouldn't this message have been blocked?

Why? HOTINVESTMENT2U.INFO has no TXT record, hence the check delivers 
"none", which is accepted as it should.












































------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users

Reply via email to