On Thursday 03 September 2009 19:52:07 Joseph C. Lininger wrote: > Good afternoon, > > > This is done in a way such that a reverse lookup looks a little different > > than normal by introducing an extra CNAME lookup step (see example below) > > and I'm simply wondering if I could run into problems with certain smtp > > servers when delivering mail to them from my courier server > > (slash.sentinel.dk). > > You should have no problems as long as the resolver used by the mail > server you're delivering to handles it properly. To my knowledge, all of > them do. A cname is a perfectly reasonable response to a request for a > ptr, and should just cause the resolver to restart the lookup with the > name specified in the cname response. It results in some extra overhead, > but that's a problem any time you use cname records.
Thanks. What I was hoping to hear. :-) Best regards, Frederik Dannemare ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
