>>>>> "JS" == Julian Scheid writes: [...]
JS> I've been neglecting XmlDoclet since the advent of JS> HtmlDoclet. Also, I'm not aware of any active users other than a JS> few people playing around with it. Since it's no longer in sync JS> with HtmlDoclet anyway, I think it's not necessary to update it at JS> this point in time. JS> TexiDoclet's current incarnation is obsolete as well, I will JS> hopefully manage to replace it in the not-so-far future. I've JS> already got some new code on my local filesystem. JS> So I would say it is safe to focus on HtmlDoclet for now. We can JS> still care about updating the other doclets at a later time. JS> If there are any users of XmlDoclet or TexiDoclet who would beg to JS> differ, please step forward :) I would like to put a vote in for support/porting TexiDoclet so it works with the most recent (0.7.4) of Gjdoc. I've just started doing some Java development again, and would like to be able to use info's nice feature of doing a global search across all the docs in the JDK for a string. Also nice not to have have to fire up a browser just to look up a method documentation, with the info mode in Emacs it's all there at your fingertips in Emacs. I'd be happy to test/work on Julian's code he mentioned above. I should soon have an environment in which I can build gjdoc from source. With Fedora Core 4 coming out real soon now (test releases are already out), it will have gjdoc built in and also GCC 4.0 which appears to be necessary to build gjdoc from source. To any Red Hat-ers out there: are the gcc4 packages in Fedora Core 3 sufficient to build gjdoc? Also being an official GNU project, we should be supporting texinfo format, especially for the GNU classpath API docs themselves and also other third-party sources. For this reason, I'm not so worried about the XmlDoclet right now, but texinfo support should be maintained and I'll do what I can to help/test. Cheers, Alex _______________________________________________ Cp-tools-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/cp-tools-discuss
