[CCing Gabor in case he's not on the list] On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 02:16:09PM +0200, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> Looking at the reports it seems there are relatively few reports for Padre. > > So my question is, if this is normal or are some smokers skipping > Padre for some reason? > In other words, how could I get more reports on more platforms? You depend on Wx, which is excluded from my testing because in my experience it can only be built manually, as it's hard to automate the ritual circle of goat's blood that's needed. So even if I didn't also exclude Padre.* from testing, you still wouldn't get any test results from me, because of the missing dependency. Padre.* is excluded from my testing simply to save the time that would be wasted chasing dependencies for something that's never going to work anyway because of the missing Wx. If you could seperate bits that aren't dependent on threading or Wx out into other packages and have Padre depend on them, then you would at least get better testing of those bits. No idea how practical that is though. -- header FROM_DAVID_CANTRELL From =~ /david.cantrell/i describe FROM_DAVID_CANTRELL Message is from David Cantrell score FROM_DAVID_CANTRELL 15.72 # This figure from experimentation
