On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Barbie <bar...@missbarbell.co.uk> wrote: > I'm happy to go with either solution. Though the summary line version > probably is the more correct solution, the X-header would be the easier > to parse.
OK. It turned out to be a lot more work than I originally anticipated, but I just released Test-Reporter-1.57: - includes full Perl -V output -- for human consumption - adds X-Test-Reporter-Perl header -- for easier parsing Here's the format: X-Test-Reporter-Perl: v5.12.0 RC0 I think in CPAN::Testers::Common::Article it's just a matter of saving it from the header into an attribute in new() and then having _extract_perl_version parse the saved value if it exists instead of searching the report body. The header will also be preserved through file save/load, but I have not yet done corresponding work on the CT2.0 Test::Reporter::Transport::Metabase. (I'm out of tuits for tonight) It's possible that all 5.12.0 reports on CT2.0 will need to be purged. I view this all as an awful stop-gap measure, but the value of smoking against 5.12.0 RC perls seems worth it. If anyone has problems with 1.57, please let me know ASAP. -- David