I still see the gap in the PASS Summary but the good
news is that the 2+ day delay in processing the CPAN
Testers reports seems to have been resolved.
What ended up being the problem?
--Chris
On 8/14/2011 9:45 AM, chm wrote:
Well, the PASS Summary "glitch" has now spread to
the PDL data as well for which the missing reports
are the ones since I took over as release manager
for PDL. It looks like we're back to the original
hypothesis that it is related to who releases a
module.
Also, the CPAN Testers reports still seem to be
2 days behind. Is this understood or is it
possibly the result of some internet attack on
the metabase process?
--Chris
On 8/5/2011 6:01 PM, Chris Marshall wrote:
I think I've discovered the problem/feature. The missing
reports are for module versions that have been deleted
from CPAN to remain only on backpan.
I would argue that the PASS matrix should not change
just because a module is subsequently removed from
CPAN as that is still the most recent module version
with a PASS.
The use of a CPAN/backpan filter for the PASS matrix
could give one a misleading impression of what version
of a module is good.
Cheers,
Chris
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Christian Walde<mitha...@yahoo.de> wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 12:58:08 +0200, chm<devel.chm...@gmail.com> wrote:
The CPAN PASS Matrix for OpenGL is still
inconsistent with the actual information.
It appears that in addition to the builder
being 2+ days behind that the previously
determined information is not maintained.
For example, http://pass.cpantesters.org/distro/O/OpenGL.html
only release 0.57 is reported. I just now
realized that the missing reports are all
since I took over releases for OpenGL.
Does that suggest what might be going on
with the update inconsistency?
The actual cpan matrix looks fine:
http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=OpenGL%200.66
So this seems to be something specifically only for the pass
generator, not
the reports themselves.
--
With regards,
Christian Walde
