Steffen Schwigon <steffen.schwi...@amd.com> writes:
> Hi!
>
> I am polishing our current "Tapper"[1] release 4.0 via CPAN Testers.
>
> As usual it's a great help. I found lots of micro issues, dependency
> bugs, and platform specific gotchas. Thanks!
>
> One module, Tapper::MCP, is not tested, probably due to its long running
> test suite (~10min on modern average PC) which might hit timeouts in the
> Smokers.
>
> However, this "MCP" is the heart of our automation layer and machine
> scheduler, and I would like to get a feeling of it's functionality from
> CPAN Testers.
>
> May I kindly ask some of you for testing it explicitely, if possible[2]?
>
> Is there something else I could do with such long running test suites?
> And is the long duration the root case at all?
>
Chance of all tests passing for Tapper-MCP's dependencies is:
1.8%
(According to
http://deps.cpantesters.org/?module=Tapper%3A%3AMCP&perl=any+version&os=any+OS )
--
Slaven Rezic - slaven <at> rezic <dot> de
BBBike - route planner for cyclists in Berlin
WWW version: http://www.bbbike.de
Perl/Tk version for Unix and Windows: http://bbbike.sourceforge.net
