>>>>> On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 15:18:44 -0500, David Solimano <da...@solimano.org> 
>>>>> said:

  > Certainly, here's my CPAN.pm, what else would you like?

Thanks, I don't find any obvious problem in it.

But I found this report:
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/4a1a1c4d-70d5-1014-ba70-b9c05cf4dae8
that indicates that there was a Log::Dispatch::Array 1.003 in @INC for
this same perl. It was coming from
/home/solimanod/.cpan/build/Log-Dispatch-Array-1.003-TdTCEJ/blib/arch
which indicates it was probably not installed at the time of that older
test. Suspicious is that this same perl does not have it. There are
certainly plausible explanation why this might be OK but does any apply?

Are you installing after smoking? Always/never/sometimes?

Are you recycling your perl installations?

This perl was compiled Jul 12 2012 14:17:21. There are already releases
of 5.14.3 and 5.14.4. Maybe such a perl needs to be phased out or
reinstalled from scratch?

I have no good solution (yet) at hand for that. I really love second
level dependencies, they are such a pita:)

-- 
andreas

Reply via email to