> No, it means that I see no evidence that it needs fixing. David Golden said earlier in the thread: "If the missing prereqs are detected by CPAN::Reporter, then *no* report should be sent. (Until we implement DEPFAIL as we discussed in Berlin.)"
I agree -- by sending FAIL messages without satisfying prereqs, an invalid report is being sent. This is very frustrating as many of my distributions are receiving many failure messages inappropriately, which is polluting the results. On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 5:03 AM, David Cantrell <da...@cantrell.org.uk> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:51:34AM -0700, Karen Etheridge wrote: > > > Absent evidence to the contrary, I'm going to put this down to > something > > > else breaking the toolchain, and you're the one who noticed because > > > your code is toolchain-ish and so interacted with it. > > Does this mean that your smoker is fixed now? > > No, it means that I see no evidence that it needs fixing. > > > I've been seeing this issue a *lot*, across a lot of different > > distributions. Here are some other failures with the same issue: > > > > > http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/9ec56e7e-c332-11e4-af4e-59047db652c0 > > > http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/50166e4a-c332-11e4-a3e4-48ce7cb652c0 > > > http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/ca4a0030-c3fc-11e4-8ffc-88127db652c0 > > ... > > Thanks > > -- > David Cantrell | Godless Liberal Elitist > > engineer: n. one who, regardless of how much effort he puts in > to a job, will never satisfy either the suits or the scientists >
