Quoting David Cantrell (2021-08-29 20:43:52) > On 29/08/2021 17:34, Slaven Rezic wrote: > > 17. 08. 2021. u 13:59, Jonas Smedegaard piše: > >> I am trying to understand the real cause of the test failure here: > >> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/9420f4a4-feca-11eb-bc66-57723b537541 > >> > >> Error message talks about missing POD::Parser, and yes that module > >> is needed, but should be pulled in since it is a > >> runtime-requirement of POD::Constants which the cpantest states is > >> installed. > >> > >> What am I missing?
> > could be something similar like > > https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=132139 Thanks, Slaven - and sorry for totally missing your previous bugreport addressing this very issue :-/ > Indeed. bin/licensecheck has `#!/usr/bin/env perl` so it's using > whichever perl is first in the path, not whichever perl your code is > being tested with. > > Best practice is to instead have `#!perl` as a placeholder shebang line. > Then when you `make` (using EU::MM) the path to the correct perl will be > filled in for you, in a copy of the script at blib/script/licensecheck, > which is what will in turn be installed. Run the version in blib/script > in your tests and you should be good. Thanks, David - I was unaware that path-less shebang was treated specially. Using that looks like the most elegant approach. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
