On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 08:25:44PM +0200, Alex Muntada wrote: > > Won't it? An automatic report on June 15 for XML-Simple-1.08 sent > > a grade of FAIL, even though the error message said compilation > > was aborted at the Makefile.PL stage.
It does not look like an automatic smoking report on recent uploaded modules; it is a manual run during regular usage of installing modules via CPANPLUS, where it may ask for sending reports as the modules are tested. A 'cpansmoke -a' will ignore a Makefile.PL-stage error without prompting the user. Since the prompt during interactive usage defaults to 'N', CPANPLUS trusts the user to have enough sense to distinguish between a failed dependency and a incorrect Makefile.PL. Maybe I should double-check with the user if she wants to send out a FAIL on Makefile.PL/make stage. Would that be safety enough? > I think the better alternative is to have in your Makefile.PL > something like > Please, Autrijus, correct me if I'm wrong. This is entirely correct. I appreciate it a lot. :-) Thanks, /Autrius/
msg38096/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
