"Sam Tregar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 01 Feb 2008 00:41:49 +0100, Slaven Rezic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Probably it's easier to have some check in the 02yaml.t test and skip
> > it if necessary.
> >
>
> You guys are hilarious! It's as though the tests themselves had no meaning
> at all - all you want is 100% passed, and it's no big deal if we have to
> cheat to get there!
>
> My module is useless with a broken XML::SAX install. Why would I want my
> tests to pass if the module itself can't be used?
>
But you understand the problem? What I can do is blacklisting this
distribution (or, if you don't want any testing at all, all your
distributions). But I can do it only for my smoking system; you have
to ask the same from all present and future testers.
Maybe the XML::SAX author can be persuaded to create a working
ParserDetails.ini already in blib, so everything works while XML::SAX
is not yet installed.
Regards,
Slaven
--
Slaven Rezic - slaven <at> rezic <dot> de
BBBike - route planner for cyclists in Berlin
WWW version: http://www.bbbike.de
Perl/Tk version for Unix and Windows: http://bbbike.sourceforge.net
