On Oct 9, 2009, at 8:15 AM, Ricardo Signes wrote:
* David Golden <xda...@gmail.com> [2009-10-09T07:51:56]
21. Formalize optional_features
Proposal:
Optional features: is supported in META.yml, but it requires a lot of
manual intervention and trickery to make it work. And it is very
poorly
documented. (Tux)
Either ditch optional_features or make its contents reflect the top-
level
(build)_(requires)-like stuff.
Mostly I am opposed to optional features.
Agreed. I think adding the ability to add a description field to
suggests/recommends
so an author can describe why they are suggested would be better
Graham.
