* David Golden <[email protected]> [2009-10-31T15:45:31] > On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Barbie <[email protected]> wrote: > > Agreed on both counts. "type" as proposed can be easily derived from the > > URLs from the examples. Is there a use case for its use? > > Both Subversion, and Git repositories can use "http://"; URLs, so there > needs to disambiguate them.
I believe the question was about "type: github" which is not useful. A type for git v. svn is crucial. -- rjbs
