David Golden wrote: > Right now, the draft says "an identifier" and that >term could be defined further.
I take "identifier", without further explanation, to mean /[A-Za-z_][0-9A-Za-z_]*/. Not anything involving \w, note. -zefram
David Golden wrote: > Right now, the draft says "an identifier" and that >term could be defined further.
I take "identifier", without further explanation, to mean /[A-Za-z_][0-9A-Za-z_]*/. Not anything involving \w, note. -zefram