On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 02:38:02PM -0700, John SJ Anderson wrote:
> On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 10:57 AM, David Golden <x...@xdg.me> wrote:
>
> >
> > https://github.com/Perl-Toolchain-Gang/toolchain-site/blob/master/berlin-consensus.md
> >
> > I've posted the Berlin Consensus document.
> >
>
> Perhaps this will come in the "color commentary" version, but I wonder if
> there was any discussion of how to best handle the situation where a module
> starts "way downstream" but ends up "way upstream" because of popular
> adoption, *if the module author doesn't agree to the "way upstream"
> recommended policies*.
The answer was "fork nicely".
--
Philippe Bruhat (BooK)
To flaunt your strength is to make it your weakness.
(Moral from Groo The Wanderer #25 (Epic))
