> On Dec 22, 2015, at 5:05 PM, Neil Bowers <neil.bow...@cogendo.com> wrote: > > Any thoughts on what factors should be included in such a metric? I think it > should really include factors that it would be hard for anyone to argue with. > Currently the individual factors are: > > Not having too many CPAN Testers fails > Having a META.json or META.yml file > Specifying the min perl version required for the dist
Number (and age if possible) of open tickets might show if someone's paying attention to the dist. Like David said, much like the adoption criteria. The issues don't have to be valid, they could even be spam for all it matters, as long as someone's taking care of them.
