Greg Landrum wrote: > On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Paul Melis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I'd like to see proof of the claim that SWIG's wrapper code is >> inefficient. In my experience it is not more inefficient than what, for >> example, boost.python via Py++ provides. >> > > I was curious about the claims of SWIG's inefficiency, so I did a > quick little experiment. >
The claim of SWIG inefficiency is when compared to SIP or hand wrapping. python.boost is not particularly efficient either. That's the cost for having safer wrapper, I guess cheers, David _______________________________________________ Cplusplus-sig mailing list Cplusplus-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
