I looks at what it would take to write proper hash functions. These classes have ridiculously complicated equality operators. I am going to throw a type error and any users who don't like it can bite me.
Thanks guys. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] thon.org] On Behalf Of Alex Mohr Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 11:19 AM To: Development of Python/C++ integration Subject: Re: [C++-sig] mutable object has bogus __hash__ > I would like to have the __hash__ not exist. These objects are mutable > and should NOT be used as keys. Is there a way to hide it? If I have > them throw NotImplemented will python do something sensible with that? Python raises a TypeError for unhashable things: >>> [1,2,3].__hash__() Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> TypeError: list objects are unhashable (You get the same with hash([1,2,3]) of course.) Alex _______________________________________________ Cplusplus-sig mailing list Cplusplus-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig _______________________________________________ Cplusplus-sig mailing list Cplusplus-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
