Have you tried -fvisibility=hidden on GCC? That chomps a good few megabyte off my bindings.
Cheers, Niall On 23 Jan 2009 at 15:51, Renato Araujo wrote: > hi David, > > This size is about my library, when I use "class_" and ".def()" > templates from libboost_python. And about the g++ flags I use -Os > which includes most of the flags for size optimizations. I tried with > others flags but the difference is minimum, nothing significant. > > Thanks > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 2:43 PM, David Abrahams <d...@boostpro.com> wrote: > > > > on Fri Jan 23 2009, Renato Araujo <renatox-AT-gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> I'm current using "CXXFLAGS=-ffunction-sections -Os" and "LDFLAGS > >> --gc-sections", and the library already striped, without strip the > >> size is about 12MB. > > > > There's a lot more you can do. -fomit-frame-pointer, > > -finline-functions, ...man gcc, man > > > > There's no reason in and of itself that templates should cause this > > thing to be big. You /are/ talking about the size of your binding .so > > and not libboost_python, right? > > > > -- > > Dave Abrahams > > BoostPro Computing > > http://www.boostpro.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Cplusplus-sig mailing list > > Cplusplus-sig@python.org > > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig > > > > > > -- > Renato Araujo Oliveira Filho > _______________________________________________ > Cplusplus-sig mailing list > Cplusplus-sig@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig _______________________________________________ Cplusplus-sig mailing list Cplusplus-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
