Haoyu Bai wrote:
This naming style is a bit more clear but broken user's build scripts
- not a big problem though. But when all the Python community evolved
to py3k, and 2.x come into history, should we change the name back
from libboost_python_py3.so to libboost_python.so?
Can we postpone this question for another ten or so years ? :-)
Regards,
Stefan
--
...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
_______________________________________________
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
