Hello,
the Py++ documentation has several recommendations how to solve registration
order problems with member functions.
Like for example this solution (from the documentation):
>s2 = mb.class_( "S2" )
>s2.member_function( "do_smth" ).use_overload_macro = True
But what to do if the class constructors have a registration order problem? I
tried
>test = mb.class_( "Test" )
>for c in test.constructors():
> c.use_overload_macro = True
but this doesn't solve the problem described below.
The (condensed) code I want to pythonify is:
--------------------
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
class Test:public std::string{
public:
Test(std::string);
Test(char*);
Test(char);
void printme();
};
Test::Test(std::string s):std::string(s){
}
Test::Test(char *s):std::string(s){
}
Test::Test(char c):std::string(1,c){
}
void Test::printme(){
std::cout<<*this<<std::endl;
}
--------------------
However, a test of the generated python module shows:
>In [1]: import testmodule
>In [2]: t=testmodule.Test("Hello")
>In [3]: t.printme()
>H #(expected "Hello" here)
This indicated that the Test(char) constructor is applied although a string was
given.
How can I solve the problem? If possible only with module builder functions,
without changes to the C code?
Thanks
Werner
_______________________________________________
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
