Hi,
I'm trying to compare different python-C wrapping techniques to see
which would be faster and also more suited to game development.
I'm using Stackless Python 2.6.2 and boost 1.39.0. I implemented a
simple Vec3 (3D vector) class in C++ and wrapped it with boost:python.
All it does is multiplications and additions, so it implements just two
operators.
The thing is, it proves to be kind of slow compared to Cython/Pyrex code
that does the same. I think it should run faster than Cython code.
(Note: Cython is not an abbreviation for C/Python API)
I compiled the python library from boost, in release mode, and then
linked the vec3 module, provided below,
to the compiled boost_python library. (I used -O2 when compiling the
vec3 module)
The testing goes like this: each "tick", 10000 objects update their
position, according to their velocity and timedelta since last "tick",
and I'm measuring the average time a tick takes to complete.
On my machine doing this with Cython takes ~0.026 sec/tick, while doing
it with boost.python takes like 0.052 sec/tick
(The overhead introduced by python's iterating through the list of
objects each tick is about 0.01 sec)
During one tick, for each object, python runs this: "self.position +=
self.velocity * time_delta",
where position and velocity are instances of Vec3.
I was hoping for results better than with Cython, by using Boost. Am I
doing something wrong?
Source code:
vec3.cpp
==========
#include <boost/python.hpp>
using namespace boost::python;
class Vec3 {
float x, y, z;
public:
Vec3(float x, float y, float z);
Vec3 &operator*=(float scalar);
Vec3 operator*(float scalar) const;
Vec3 &operator+=(const Vec3 &who);
// that `const Vec3` is REALLY needed, unless you want error monsoon
to come down
};
// === boost:python wrapper ===
// publish just += and * to python
BOOST_PYTHON_MODULE(vec3)
{
class_<Vec3>("Vec3", init<float, float, float>())
.def(self += self)
.def(self * float())
;
}
// === implementation ===
Vec3::Vec3(float x, float y, float z) {
this->x = x;
this->y = y;
this->z = z;
}
Vec3 & Vec3::operator*=(float scalar) {
this->x *= scalar;
this->y *= scalar;
thiz->z *= scalar;a
}
Vec3 Vec3::operator*(float scalar) const {
return Vec3(*this) *= scalar;
}
Vec3 & Vec3::operator+=(const Vec3 &who) {
this->x += who.x;
this->y += who.y;
this->z += who.z;
return *this;
}
_______________________________________________
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
