Hi thanks for you help, On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 4:59 AM, Hans Meine <hans_me...@gmx.net> wrote: > On Dienstag 05 Januar 2010, Renato Araujo wrote: >> I would like to know if is possible to avoid this level of conversion >> and tell to boost.python only try the direct conversion, > > Not as far as I know. > >> because this >> make the functions call slower then normal calls, > > But only if you pass objects that need to be converted, right? Yes but this is the user level I would like to avoid this.
> >> and some times cause >> a lot of problems in my classes. > > Details? I'm working on PySide (python bindings for Qt), and I have a lot of classes and a lot of implicitly conversions. Example: I have a class QVariant (Docs: http://doc.trolltech.com/4.6/qvariant.html) with many constructos, adn each type has your implicitly conversion rule. One example is QCorlor (Docs: http://doc.trolltech.com/4.6/qcolor.html) this is implicitly conversible from "int". Then when I create a QVariant(1) (passing int as argument) boost.python call the QVariant(QColor) constructor. I think this happening because boost.python try the implicitly conversion before verify the other basics signatures. This is one of the case I have a lot of others because I have more then 100 classes and more then 200 implicitly conversions rules, it's almost impossible to me, manager this if the conversion can happen in every class level. > > You might have problems with overloaded functions, in which case Troy's > recently suggested BPL extension would most likely help. (I am looking > forward to its integration). Where I can get more info about this I searched in ML but I did not find any info related. > > Ciao, / / .o. > /--/ ..o > / / ANS ooo Thanks _______________________________________________ Cplusplus-sig mailing list Cplusplus-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig