Ravi wrote:
On Friday 06 November 2009 14:52:49 troy d. straszheim wrote:
Currently, the converter type still leaks out to python in the signature:
class S(Boost.Python.instance)
| add(...)
| add( (S)arg1, (object)arg2) -> None :
|
| C++ signature :
| void add(S*,to_optional<int>
(*)(boost::python::api::object))
converters won't nest:
def("foo", as<returnvalue(arg1, conv1(conv2(arg2)))>(&somefn)); // nah
I dont have a mechanism for hooking a user defined converter into the
return type. I'm going to have to think about that one a bit more.
Did you have any ideas on this, Troy? This is the last bit I think I'd need in
order to replace my code with yours.
Hi Ravi,
I haven't looked, I got pulled away. I hope to be back to this soon though.
-t
_______________________________________________
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
