On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 12:38 -0800, lin yun wrote: > I did not mention that I had no problem with Boost 1.34, on the same > system. Also I ever tried Boost 1.34 and 1.37 on Fedora 7, I got > exactly the same result: Boost 1.34 worked fine while 1.37 failed on > extension test. The test I ran was the example test from boost > package: libs/python/example/quickstart/, which was recommended in > the boost python installation instruction. There was no any personal > code involved. > > I wonder if you, or anyone else had related experience ? >
I have not, but I haven't tried boost > 1.34.1 on any Red Hat distros. I can confirm that this example compiles successfully with Boost 1.40 and the latest trunk on Ubuntu 9.10 (gcc 4.4.1). You may have noticed the line gcc aborts on: > > > > ../../../../boost/type_traits/detail/cv_traits_impl.hpp:37: > internal > > compiler error: in make_rtl_for_nonlocal_decl, at > cp/decl.c:5067 > > has not changed between Boost 1.34 and 1.35, but it refers to the macro BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT, which is defined in boost/config/suffix.hpp, and reflects whether a compiler supports in-class initialization of static integral constant members. Perhaps your compiler does not fully support this feature, but boost thinks it does? Try adding the line #define BOOST_NO_INCLASS_MEMBER_INITIALIZATION to boost/config/user.hpp. Then recompile boost. Jim Bosch _______________________________________________ Cplusplus-sig mailing list Cplusplus-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
