On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 14:23, cammm <cameron.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > So I've just started playing with pybindgen and having used pyobject plus > and > boost::python before I have to say, it is a breathe of fresh air. > > Simple, explicit, fast and written in python. I'm not a fan of automatic > coverage / source code parsing, explicit description of the python > interface > doesn't take that long and validates what you are doing. It is also nice > not > having thousands of files and a large build process as you get with boost, > when all you want is a nice way to do python bindings. > > Many thanks to you Gustavo for a brilliant project and I encourage everyone > to try it out and get behind him to help develop it. > Thanks, glad you like it :-) > > One thing I would really like to see go in is callback methods. Was there > anything technical blocking this or just a case of haven't gotten to it > yet? > You mention in the docs it is easy to working around with some extra code, > do you have a simple example of that working? > I have not enough time and motivation. And I'm not sure how much effort it would take. There is some callback support code in NS-3 (www.nsnam.org), but in NS-3 "callbacks" are actually objects. It's not a very simple example to learn from. I will try to come up with a simple example soon. > > Again, kudos and thanks :-) > - > Cameron > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/Callbacks-in-PyBindGen-tp28595532p28595532.html > Sent from the Python - c++-sig mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > Cplusplus-sig mailing list > Cplusplus-sig@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig > -- Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro INESC Porto, UTM, WiN, http://win.inescporto.pt/gjc "The universe is always one step beyond logic." -- Frank Herbert
_______________________________________________ Cplusplus-sig mailing list Cplusplus-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
