On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 9:12 AM, vishal bayskar <vishal.bays...@nechclst.in> wrote: > >>This is the reason why declaration "b" is unexposed. In this case, >>declarations "b" was declared in a header file, which was not "asked" >>to be exposed. > > Thanks again Roman for your prompt response. > > Actually my doubt was like pyplusplus exposes declaration from all included > file that are in current directory (in this particular case a.h file > includes b.h file that are in the same directory where a.h is)
Your understanding is right, but there are other factors that influence the selected declarations. As I said, it was a mistake to implement this "select by default" algorithm. You can take a look on module_builder_t class. > In the same example if I provide the absolute path for a.h > (/home/vishal/a.h) it automatically exposed the class present in b.h file. This is one of the factors I mentioned earlier. > Please explain why this happened Sorry, this days I am really busy and can devote much time to the project. All critical issues is still address in a day or two, but if the issue has acceptable work-around - I just propose it. This is exactly your case. You can "include" all declarations you want or ... to investigate by yourself :-) > > Actually in my project I am using find_out_dependency(class) function which > gives list of declaration (on which the class is depending on). > And after getting the list I am iterating on this list and including all the > declaration, but I don't know why mysteriously some classes are not getting > included (and pyplusplus is not even giving any error while including them, > in my assumption pyplusplus should give some error if some class in not > getting include). Wrong, py++ gives you a warning ( may be not in all cases, but it tries hard ) > and at the end I am seeing W1040 warnings that some classes are not getting > exposed (suppose class myName) This is exactly the warning. Since py++ allows multi-module development and integration of user code any where it can't decide whether "unexposed" declaration is erroneous situation or not. > I have checked the find_out_dependency() output and it is giving the class > myName also in the output. > > Please let me know what could be the reason behind it, and what could I do > to include those class (for example class myName). I don't know, may be father code excludes it, may be the class is private, may be bug in py++, may be bug in your "find_out_dependency-include" loop. I really can't say you. You will have to investigate this. -- Roman Yakovenko C++ Python language binding http://www.language-binding.net/ _______________________________________________ Cplusplus-sig mailing list Cplusplus-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
