Hi Niall > I would strongly recommend that you use something more modern than > GNU make. Boost's build system is much better. The one I use is scons > (http://www.scons.org/) whose only main fault is O(N^2) scaling to > source file number, a problem they are in the process of fixing.
I take your point. Personally, I find makefiles very hard to maintain. In particular, our #include dependency management is indecipherable! I guess the obvious replacements are SCons and CMake. I will take a look at these. Should one consider bjam? Thanks very much for answering my other questions. Best regards David _______________________________________________ Cplusplus-sig mailing list Cplusplus-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
