It looks like PyObject_IsSubClass is working (!), but I wanted to follow up on the boost::python::object stuff:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Jim Bosch <tallji...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 02/24/2012 02:31 AM, Adam Preble wrote: > >> Jim, >> >> I'll top post since I think this might get messy nice and fast >> otherwise. I found I couldn't get to a method wrapped to type a >> PyTypeObject* and only PyObject* would do. >> > > Yeah, that's not surprising. You can also have it take a > boost::python::object; that's essentially a smart pointer for PyObject*. > I couldn't get that to work. I can't pass it directly into PyObject_IsSubclass, which isn't surprising. However, I couldn't do a get or find anything else to extract the PyObject* out of it. Is there a trick to this? I would wonder--is there a particular reason I should use that instead? In my case, I'm not trying to sit on the pointer outside of the class to Has(). The list I'm using has shared_ptr's of the underlying type already. So I assume in my particular case I wouldn't have to worry about it. > >
_______________________________________________ Cplusplus-sig mailing list Cplusplus-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
