I'm sorry, I understand that with my argumentation I've given the wrong idea of what I meant.
I read that post from Jim Bosch and I thought he knew something more about Boost Python development. Then I completely agree that a library is absolutely not dead also if it does not support C++ 11. Personally, I won't be able to use C++ 11 for years starting from now. I would simply like to be re-ensured that Boost Python development is going on, because I like this library a lot. Best regards to all. Michele 2012/5/13 Stefan Seefeld <ste...@seefeld.name> > On 05/13/2012 05:18 AM, Michele De Stefano wrote: > > I've read a recent post by Jim Bosch saying that the original > > developers of Boost Python are not going to upgrade it for supporting > > C++11 standard libraries. > > Can you elaborate a little on what you mean by "supporting C++ 11" ? > Specifically, in what way is it not supported right now ? > > > > > So I simply would like to understand if this great library is going to > > die or if it is kept up to date by someone else. > > Implying that it is "going to die" simply because it isn't changed to > support C++ 11 features is quite a stretch, don't you think ? > > How many compilers exist right now that fully support C++ 11 ? And how > many users exist who are willing to switch at this point in time ? > > Stefan > > > -- > > ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin... > > _______________________________________________ > Cplusplus-sig mailing list > Cplusplus-sig@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig > -- Michele De Stefano Web Site <http://www.micheledestefano.joomlafree.it> Linked In <http://it.linkedin.com/in/micheledestefano> mds-utils: a general purpose Open Source library<http://code.google.com/p/mds-utils> <http://it.linkedin.com/in/micheledestefano>
_______________________________________________ Cplusplus-sig mailing list Cplusplus-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
