On 05/14/2012 04:05 PM, Niall Douglas wrote: > Debian doesn't necessarily install by default > multiple versions of compilers, rather they're in the repos available > as package dependencies. Surely Fedora is the same? Nope, I was talking about the repositories.
> Ah, my build system has been scons for years now. As that's really > python, it's trivial to scan /usr/bin for anything which can compile > and invoke each with --version or take a guess from their filename. Okay, we're on cmake here. I really should take a look at scons. I mean, its python. > Indeed. My experience has been trying when reporting complex > metaprogramming bugs in GCC. They say things like "we regularly test > against Boost and the compiler passes all its regression tests, > therefore the bug can't be in our compiler". Understandable, but > frustrating. This sounds a bit like one should add that testcase to the regression testsuite in boost to get a gcc bug fixed, eh? ;). >> Clang doesn't compile boost python 1.49 at all. Sadly. Sure, you're right. Sorry, it was my fault in reading clang's error messages. It chockes on the c++ stl bits, not on boost, but they're included from boost, so the first thing I read was “boost”. Well, I cannot tell if it would choke on boost too, but I guess your testing setup is more sane than mine (at least it's not holding a spatula). -- Jonas _______________________________________________ Cplusplus-sig mailing list Cplusplus-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
