On 22 May 2012 at 18:33, Jonas Wielicki wrote: > > BTW - can I just clarify you ARE compiling the entire of BPL using > > C++11 throughout? Linking C++11 to C++03 is *supposed* to work (but > > not the other way round), but I can see nests of vipers in it. > Ehm, I guess not, so I just downloaded and rebuilt boost 1.48 in the > virtual machine (no fun) with -std=c++11 flag (I added this in the > project-options.jam file at the using line; running ./b2 -d2 showed me > that the flag was passed to the gcc too). Still, the crash occurs at the > same place.
Ok. > > Given the information so far, you have an excellent chance of getting > > it fixed. > Okay, so I'm taking you suggest I submit both compilation attempts > (inheritance.cpp and crashtest.cpp) with -save-temps for comparision to > the gcc devs? Of course with all the information I gathered so far. Include the answers to the questions I asked about force inlining, is BPL compiled as c++11, the problem doesn't show in c++03 etc. It shows you've been thorough. Do post the bugzilla link here, I'd like to CC into it. Thanks, Niall -- Technology & Consulting Services - ned Productions Limited. http://www.nedproductions.biz/. VAT reg: IE 9708311Q. Work Portfolio: http://careers.stackoverflow.com/nialldouglas/ _______________________________________________ Cplusplus-sig mailing list Cplusplus-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
