On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 01:55:45PM +0200, Sampo Syreeni wrote: > But why should this be limited to the book stores? The same should go for > laudries etc. In this sense we *are* talking about privileges to those > dealing with 1st Amendment protected material, like the press and book > stores. Declan's problem obviously is that while free speech has > constitutional protection in itself, here *privacy* is protected only via > extension of the 1st Amendment protection. This isn't enough. That's a nice way to word it, and sums my thoughts up nicely. -Declan
- freedomforum.org: Federal judge quashes subpoena for Kans... Jim Choate
- Re: CDR: freedomforum.org: Federal judge quashes sub... Declan McCullagh
- Re: CDR: freedomforum.org: Federal judge quashes... Declan McCullagh
- Re: freedomforum.org: Federal judge quashes ... Jim Choate
- Re: CDR: Re: freedomforum.org: Federal j... John Young
- Re: freedomforum.org: Federal judge quas... Sampo Syreeni
- Re: CDR: Re: freedomforum.org: Fede... Jim Choate
- Re: CDR: Re: freedomforum.org: Fede... Declan McCullagh
- Re: CDR: Re: freedomforum.org: Federal j... Declan McCullagh
- Re: CDR: Re: freedomforum.org: Fede... Declan McCullagh
