The recipient of this message has exceeded their message limits, they have not received the full text of your message
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 06:19:50PM -0600, Jim Choate wrote: > It isn't the store that's being protected. It's the purchaser of the > book, the reader to wit. To force a person to reveal their reading habits Same principle. Why should book buyers deserve more privacy than condom buyers? Your thinking is muddled. I've already stipulated that civil/criminal discovery is far too broad in the U.S. > Journalist are scum (like lawyers) they sell their integrity, they deserve > no protection and actually get none. If you look at the history and Hahahahahahahaha. -Declan
