Jim Choate wrote: > > Really? > > So let me get this straight. You're so worried about taps and > interceptions that you are willing to potentially spend thousands of > dollars on the hardware to detect the sorts of events under question (ie > astronomical RNG's). Actually I am not. > So normal old terrestrial sources aren't good enogh because they might > be tampered with. If that is your threat model. Again, go back and read this guy's paper. The random source is available to anyone in his scheme. > But you're ok with going out and buying a webcam from who knows where? If that's my threat model, yes. If it's not, I may be willing to build my own set of web cams, etc. -- ----------------------Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos--------------------------- + ^ + :Surveillance cameras|Passwords are like underwear. You don't /|\ \|/ :aren't security. A |share them, you don't hang them on your/\|/\ <--*-->:camera won't stop a |monitor, or under your keyboard, you \/|\/ /|\ :masked killer, but |don't email them, or put them on a web \|/ + v + :will violate privacy|site, and you must change them very often. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sunder.net ------------
