On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 07:38:41AM +0200, Anonymous wrote: > The mere intensity of state's handling of Jim Bell suggests > that there is something genuine about AP, but what it is still escapes me. That would presume a sufficient amount of intelligence on the part of federal agents that -- since I first moved to DC in 1991 -- I have generally seen lacking. As others have pointed out, AP is hardly implementable at the moment, so your explanation doesn't quite work. -Declan
- AP is *not* the point Blank Frank
- Re: AP is *not* the point Anonymous
- RE: AP is *not* the point Sandy Sandfort
- Re: AP is *not* the point Declan McCullagh
- Re: AP is *not* the point Blank Frank