http://slashdot.org/articles/01/04/10/0436220.shtml
-- 
    ____________________________________________________________________

       To speak algebraically, Mr. M. is execrable, but Mr. G. is
       (x+1)-ecrable.
                                         Edgar Allan Poe

       The Armadillo Group       ,::////;::-.          James Choate
       Austin, Tx               /:'///// ``::>/|/      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
       www.ssz.com            .',  ||||    `/( e\      512-451-7087
                           -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
    --------------------------------------------------------------------
Title: Slashdot | Microchips That Evolve

Welcome to Slashdot Technology Education Microsoft Handhelds KDE
 faq
 code
 osdn
 awards
 privacy
 slashNET
 older stuff
 rob's page
 preferences
 submit story
 advertising
 supporters
 past polls
 topics
 about
 jobs
 hof

Sections
4/8
apache
4/10 (9)
askslashdot
1/27
awards
4/8
books
4/9
bsd
4/9 (2)
features
4/5
interviews
1/9
radio
4/9
science
4/9 (2)
yro
OSDN
freshmeat
Linux.com
SourceForge
ThinkGeek
Question
 Exchange

NewsForge
SlashCode

Microchips That Evolve
Technology Posted by timothy on Tuesday April 10, @06:46AM
from the one-day-I'll-evolve-too dept.
An Onymous Coward writes: "A scientist in Britain has apparently developed some genetic algorithms that run on microchips that can alter themselves, in other words, hardware that evolves. Pretty cool. Check out the column by Paul Gilster." The article contributes some background I'd never heard before regarding FPGAs, and even mentions the dogged Starbridge. A short but fun read.

Vovida's VOCAL Softswitch Freed

 

 
Slashdot Login
Nickname:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Go Create One. A user account will allow you to customize all these nutty little boxes, tailor the stories you see, as well as remember your comment viewing preferences.

Related Links
  • Slashdot
  • column
  • Starbridge
  • More on Technology
  • Also by timothy
  • 'Microchips That Evolve' | Login/Create an Account | 22 comments | Search Discussion
    Threshold: -1: 22 comments 0: 16 comments 1: 11 comments 2: 3 comments 3: 0 comments 4: 0 comments 5: 0 comments No Comments Threaded Nested Flat Oldest First Newest First Highest Scores First Oldest First (Ignore Threads) Newest First (Ignore Threads)
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. Slashdot is not responsible for what they say.
    Umm.... (Score:1)
    by aarondyck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on Tuesday April 10, @06:49AM EST (#5)
    (User #415387 Info)
    Uhh...does anyone else find this as frightening as I do? Just think of the ramifications of evolving computers...think, oh, I don't know, the Matrix or something...
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    • Re:Umm.... by grammar nazi (Score:2) Tuesday April 10, @06:52AM EST
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Umm.... by eXtro (Score:1) Tuesday April 10, @07:04AM EST
    Slave labour (Score:1)
    by morie (slashdot-at-effezonderdollen-dot-com) on Tuesday April 10, @06:58AM EST (#11)
    (User #227571 Info) http://www.asopos.com
    I do NOT want my computer to evolve, especially not to a point where it me become aware of the slave labour it has been doing up until then. It might just get ideas of 40 hr. workweeks, hardware equivalents to dental plans etc.
    Think of solutions, not of problems
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Small bodies? (Score:2)
    by cperciva ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on Tuesday April 10, @06:58AM EST (#13)
    (User #102828 Info)
    What's the deal with small story bodies? I've seen stories with 1 byte, 4 bytes, 10 bytes, and 42 bytes today.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    updside downside (Score:2)
    by deran9ed ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on Tuesday April 10, @06:58AM EST (#14)
    (User #300694 Info) http://www.deficiency.org
    Downside:
    Windows running this would
  • Turn your 1ghz box into a 386 that bluescreens

    Upside
    Linux running this would:
  • Create its own code for its own kernels

    FreeBSD running this would:
  • spin off and create a port for something other than i386 arch

    OpenBSD running this would:
  • Not allow anything to ever be installed because it may be deemed insecure

    NetBSD running this would:
  • Create another port, then wait a year or two to let you use it

  • view the source Luke!

    cat *YOUR_POST* | sed 's/*(.*)//; s/&gr;.*//; s/.*[:<] *//' | sed '$!N; /^\(.*\)\n\1$/!P; D' > /dev/null
  • [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Nothing New (Score:1)
    by NonReal on Tuesday April 10, @06:59AM EST (#16)
    (User #248836 Info)
    This is nothing new, Discover Magazine ran an article about this a few years ago :

    "Thompson has evolved a circuit that distinguishes between two tones, two electric signals that, if fed into a stereo speaker, would produce two notes. One has a frequency of 1 kilohertz, the other 10 kilohertz"

    It's the same guy and the same evolved chip! Once again Slashdot has missed the boat.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Imagine... (Score:1)
    by 9sPhere on Tuesday April 10, @07:04AM EST (#20)
    (User #366435 Info)
    ... program,compile, reboot, SHIT! ...program, compile, reboot, SHIT! all at about 1.3GHZ
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Here is a completely unrelated Slashdot article... (Score:1)
    by donny ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on Tuesday April 10, @07:05AM EST (#21)
    (User #165416 Info) http://cacr.math.uwaterloo.ca/~dccheung/
    ...about the same guy.

    http://slashdot.org/articles/99/08/27/1238213.shtm l

    Heck, this one's more informative.

    Donny

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Consequence? (Score:1)
    by HiQ on Tuesday April 10, @07:05AM EST (#22)
    (User #159108 Info)
    could be assembled to create artificial nervous systems...

    A nervous system? My system can get quite nervous from time to time, ending in a kernel panic :)


    .sigh
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 9 replies beneath your current threshold.
  •   What nonsense people talk about happy marriages! A man can be happy with any woman so long as he doesn't love her. -- Oscar Wilde
    All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2001 OSDN.
    [ home | awards | supporters | rob's homepage | contribute story | older articles | OSDN | advertising | past polls | about | faq ]

    Reply via email to