> static int setup_ikconfig(char *config)
> @@ -10265,8 +10273,8 @@ static int setup_ikconfig(char *config)
> ent++;
>
> if (STRNEQ(ent, "CONFIG_")) {
Another natural fix to me is to extend the condition like:
if (STRNEQ(ent, "CONFIG_") && strstr(ent, "=")) {
But I also think the current one is good.
> - add_ikconfig_entry(ent,
> - &ikconfig_all[kt->ikconfig_ents++]);
> + if (add_ikconfig_entry(ent,
> &ikconfig_all[kt->ikconfig_ents]))
> + kt->ikconfig_ents++;
> if (kt->ikconfig_ents == IKCONFIG_MAX) {
> error(WARNING, "ikconfig overflow.\n");
> return 1;
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>
>
Thanks.
HATAYAMA, Daisuke
--
Crash-utility mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
