-----Original Message----- > On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 2:40 PM lijiang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Thanks for the update, Pingfan. > > > > The v9 change looks good to me. But I ran into some conflicts when > > applying these patches locally to test, so > > I would suggest submitting patches based on the latest crash code > > every time, which can also help Kazu save time > > although he will handle such issues. > > > > For the v9: > > Acked-by: Lianbo Jiang <[email protected]> > > > Thanks for your review and help. > > This series is based on commit eaf14f8 Fix 'waitq' command for Linux > 4.13 and later kernels > > To Kazu, should I post a rebase version? (I have tried to rebase it > against HEAD. It can rebase automatically)
There's no need to repost. The v9 patchset was cleanly applied on the current head and built with 'make target=ARM64'. Thanks, Kazu -- Crash-utility mailing list [email protected] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
