On Fri 2021-07-16 07:32 +0000, HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁) wrote:

Kazu,

> Thanks for the update.

No problem.

> > +                           for (i = 0; i < kt->cpus; i++)
> > +                                   if (NUM_IN_BITMAP(cpus, i) && 
> > check_offline_cpu(i))
> > +                                           error(INFO, "CPU %d is 
> > OFFLINE.\n", i);
> 
> With the offline hide option, "CPU xx [OFFLINE]" is shown as follows and
> this error message is not needed.
> 
> crash> set offline hide
>       offline: hide
> crash> kmem -S=15 TCP
> kmem: CPU 15 is OFFLINE.
> CACHE             OBJSIZE  ALLOCATED     TOTAL  SLABS  SSIZE  NAME
> ffff916f6798b2c0     2440         17       208     16    32k  TCP
> CPU 15 [OFFLINE]
> ...

The above was indeed intentional (to be more verbose) since the CPU(s)
is/are explicitly specified by the user.

> And the other commands do not say anything by default (offline show),
> it should be the same behavior with them.

Fair enough. Better to remain consistent.

> So with removing the for block above, (but you don't need to repost)
> Acked-by: Kazuhito Hagio <[email protected]>

Understood and thank you.





Kind regards,

-- 
Aaron Tomlin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--
Crash-utility mailing list
[email protected]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility

Reply via email to