On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 10:16 AM lijiang <liji...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 9:23 AM Kazuhito Hagio <kazuhito.ha...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Oct 8, 2022 at 12:27 PM lijiang <liji...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> --- a/ppc64.c
>> >> +++ b/ppc64.c
>> >> @@ -1947,7 +1947,7 @@ ppc64_in_emergency_stack(int cpu, ulong addr,
>> bool verbose)
>> >> if (cpu < 0 || cpu >= kt->cpus)
>> >> return NONE_STACK;
>> >>
>> >> - if (ms->emergency_sp) {
>> >> + if (ms->emergency_sp && ms->emergency_sp[cpu]) {
>> >
>> >
>> > Is it better to use the IS_KVADDR(ms->emergency_sp[cpu]) ? For example:
>> >
>> > + if (ms->emergency_sp && IS_KVADDR(ms->emergency_sp[cpu]) ) {
>>
>> Yes, looks better. Please go ahead with this.
>>
>>
> Thanks. Applied.
>
>
> https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/commit/487551488b15fcd135b29990593699a121730219
>
>
Ah, I forgot to add the "Fixes Tag ". Sorry.
Lianbo
>
--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utility@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
Contribution Guidelines: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki
