On 2023/01/12 0:30, Tao Liu wrote:
>>> @@ -275,6 +283,49 @@ static void do_mt_entry(ulong entry, ulong min, ulong
>>> max, uint depth,
>>>
>>> if (!td)
>>> return;
>>> +
>>> + if (!td->count && td->structname_args) {
>>> + /*
>>> + * Retrieve all members' info only once (count == 0)
>>> + * After last iteration all memory will be freed up
>>> + */
>>> + e = (struct req_entry **)GETBUF(sizeof(*e) *
>>> td->structname_args);
>>
>>
>> I would suggest freeing the allocated memory for "e" at the end of this
>> function.
>
> I think free "e" at the end of the function is reasonable. By a quick
> glimpse, it seems that do_xarray_entry() and do_rdtree_entry() etc.
> have the similar issue?
Ah yes, they have. But all buffers allocated by GETBUF() are
automatically freed after finishing a command, so it's not an actual
problem if you don't use more buffers than the limitation (about 2000+).
So there is no big necessity to fix them alone in this case IMHO.
>>
>> Can you help to add the FREEBUF() as below? Kazu.
>> + if (e)
>> + FREEBUF(e);
Sure, I'll do that. Please wait for a while.
>>
>> Other changes look good to me, for the v5 with the minor modification: Ack.
Also thank you for your effective reviews, Lianbo.
Thanks,
Kazu
--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utility@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
Contribution Guidelines: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki
