> On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 5:40 PM Florian Weimer <fwei...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > BTW: Could you please follow the current styles of gdb-10.2patch? > > +diff --git gdb-10.2.orig/bfd/elf-bfd.h gdb-10.2/bfd/elf-bfd.h > > +index eebdf9a..775d96c 100644 > > +--- gdb-10.2.orig/bfd/elf-bfd.h > > ++++ gdb-10.2/bfd/elf-bfd.h > > Usually, the above styles are not recommended. > > What exactly don't you like about it? It's just regular git diff output > with different prefixes. > > Sorry about it, Florian. I should provide an example to describe more details > as below: > ... > + gdb-10.2/readline/readline/configure.ac \ > > exit 0 > > @@ -2078,3 +2085,1013 @@ exit 0 > > return new_type; > } > +diff --git gdb-10.2.orig/bfd/elf-bfd.h gdb-10.2/bfd/elf-bfd.h --->remove > +index eebdf9a..775d96c 100644 --->remove > +--- gdb-10.2.orig/bfd/elf-bfd.h --->change to gdb-10.2/bfd/elf-bfd.h.orig > ++++ gdb-10.2/bfd/elf-bfd.h > +@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ > + #include "elf/internal.h" > + #include "bfdlink.h" > + > ++#include <string.h> > ++ > ... > The above styles are currently recommended and can be consistent with the > current gdb-10.2.patch.
Sorry, I still don't understand. You are quoting from my patch. Does it follow the required style or not? Could you make the required style changes yourself and push it? Thanks, Florian -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility Contribution Guidelines: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki
