On 2023/08/18 3:08, David Mair wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> Before I consider starting work on a patch for this I'd appreciate more 
> input.
> 
> I am seeing random cases of crash failing to load reporting an x86_64 
> coredump reporting a "bad" linux_banner. However, the value displayed as 
> the banner is:
> 
> 0x65762078756e694c
> 
> which is plainly ASCII text as a 64-bit number and is the little-endian 
> reversal of the text "Linux ver".
> 
> It's randomly found with specific coredumps and reproduces all times 
> with that coredump and a given version of crash, though sometimes it 
> will appear when using a given coredump with one version of crash but 
> not with another version of crash. What I'm trying to get working is 
> crash current and the rest of this is experience using crash 8.0.3 only.
> 
> I used gdb crash to debug it through verify_version(). If I breakpoint 
> there with gdb crash and step through the function I find that in the 
> section:
> 
> 
>      if (!(sp = symbol_search("linux_banner")))
>          error(FATAL, "linux_banner symbol does not exist?\n");
>      else if ((sp->type == 'R') || (sp->type == 'r') ||
>          (THIS_KERNEL_VERSION >= LINUX(2,6,11) && (sp->type == 'D' || 
> sp->type == 'd')) ||
>           (machine_type("ARM") && sp->type == 'T') ||
>           (machine_type("ARM64")))
>          linux_banner = symbol_value("linux_banner");
>      else
>          get_symbol_data("linux_banner", sizeof(ulong), &linux_banner);
> 
> 
> * The if block is not executed, i.e. symbol_search("linux_banner") 
> succeeded and we have a usable struct syment for "linux_banner" in sp
> * The else if block is not executed, all conditions are met or not 
> relevant except for the the value of sp->type in the case of 
> THIS_KERNEL_VERSION >= LINUX(2,6,11). But sp->type is 'B', bss segment
> * The final else block is executed, we copy sizeof(ulong) bytes of 
> symbol data from what "linux_banner" refers to into the crash internal 
> linux_banner variable
> 
> Here's how sp looks at the else if statement in the above code:
> 
> gdb) print *sp
> $2 = {value = 18446744071587233984, name = 0x5555566a735b "linux_banner",
>    val_hash_next = 0x7fffe51e4338, name_hash_next = 0x7fffe51f8d38,
>    type = 66 'B', cnt = 1 '\001', flags = 0 '\000', pad2 = 0 '\000'}
> 
> ...and sp->value in hex is:
> 
> (gdb) p/x sp->value
> $5 = 0xffffffff818000c0
> 
> Starting crash in --minimal mode with the same core, kernel and 
> debuginfo so that I can try to read 0xffffffff818000c0 I find:
> 
> crash> rd 0xffffffff818000c0 18
> ffffffff818000c0:  65762078756e694c 2e34206e6f697372   Linux version 4.
> ffffffff818000d0:  34392d3038312e34 6665642d3533312e   4.180-94.135-def
> ffffffff818000e0:  65672820746c7561 6c697562406f6b65   ault (geeko@buil
> ffffffff818000f0:  28202974736f6864 7372657620636367   dhost) (gcc vers
> ffffffff81800100:  2e382e34206e6f69 2045535553282035   ion 4.8.5 (SUSE
> ffffffff81800110:  29202978756e694c 20504d5320312320   Linux) ) #1 SMP
> ffffffff81800120:  20766f4e206e6f4d 35353a3930203631   Mon Nov 16 09:55
> ffffffff81800130:  204354552037353a 3033282030323032   :57 UTC 2020 (30
> ffffffff81800140:  000a293039393633 0000000000000000   36990)..........
> 
> IOW, it is the linux_banner, it's at 0xffffffff818000c0 and if the first 
> sizeof(ulong) bytes are read into crash's linux_banner variable via 
> get_symbol_data() it makes a 64-bit number with little-endian revesral 
> from the string bytes "Linux ver" from the actual linux_banner text, the 
> same value seen in the error report when crash fails.
> 
> If I repeat the above debug of verify_version() in gdb and at the else 
> if block in the above C in verify_version() I set var the sp->type to be 
> 'D' or 'd' then crash's linux_banner is set to 0xffffffff818000c0 
> (sp->value) and the else if block is executed then the remainder of the 
> function successfully finds a linux_banner and gets the version 
> information from it and crash loads.
> 
> In symbol_search() is the value of type in the returned struct syment a 
> property generated by crash (I thought not and it was based on the 
> kernel compilation, possible kdummp/makedumpfile but not controlled by 
> crash)? If I'm correct then is it safe to expect a struct syment with 
> type 'B' (also 'b' I believe) for linux_banner? Or is there anything 
> special about a bss segment type that makes it not possible to assume we 
> can take sp->value as-is for the address of the linux_banner string 
> details, i.e. we can't safely use symbol_value("linux_banner") to set 
> the crash linux_banner variable if the struct syment type for 
> linux_banner is 'B' or 'b'?
> 
> Any comments? I'll write a patch if that's the right direction but I 
> need a better understanding of why symbols with the type bss segment 
> aren't already assumed valid sources of a linux_banner address value, 
> only 'D' and 'd' types are and if there is anything special I don't 
> understand about 'B' and 'b' types.
> 

It seems that sp->type is set to a value from bfd_get_symbol_info() in 
store_symbols().  So it's from the vmlinux through the embedded gdb.

Anyway, I don't think that the current check gets the point, i.e. we can 
check the type of the linux_banner symbol directly like this?

   switch (get_symbol_type("linux_banner", NULL, NULL))
   {
       case TYPE_CODE_ARRAY:
           linux_banner = sp->value;
           break;
       case TYPE_CODE_PTR:
           get_symbol_data("linux_banner", sizeof(ulong), &linux_banner);
           break;
       default:
           error(WARNING, "linux_banner is unknown type\n");
           linux_banner = 0;
           break;
   }

I don't know why it checks the sp->type, but what it should do 
originally might be the above, I think.

Lianbo, do you have an old vmcore that has "const char *linux_banner"? 
According to crash commit fce91bec5bef, 2.6.10 and older kernels have 
it.  I'd like to test the above with it.

Thanks,
Kazu
--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utility@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
Contribution Guidelines: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki

Reply via email to